I thought about it, I reviewed the titles of all my posts, then I had to re-read some of the posts themselves, as the titles didn't fully describe the content.
I thought some more, then decided on the top three priorities. I'd appreciate some feedback from the Small Flock members on my preliminary answer for our top 3 priorities:
- Affordable, safe, nutritious, high
quality, sustainable, and
locally produced foods for Canadians.
Small Flockers are most concerned about poultry meats and eggs for the above priority.
We have concerns about the affordability, safety, nutrient levels, sustainability, and centralization of the mega chicken factory version by quota-bearing Supply Management; our beliefs being collaborated by voluminous research and critical incidents.
In spite of the drawbacks of the "officially approved" system, Canadians are treated as incompetent wards of the government, stripped of our rights to produce and consume food as we know best, and as we choose.
In the above stated priority, we have placed affordability first for a reason. If it isn't affordable, none of the other factors matter. Safety and risk are on a broad continuum, so if it is slightly higher risk but much more affordable, some people may want to consciously take that risk, for no food is 100% safe.
If someone feels consciously forced to buy unsafe food due to the unaffordability of safer food, the government should focus its efforts on improving affordability so that everybody has a reasonable choice. The less safe food will naturally disappear from the marketplace when safer, better, more affordable options appear.
The SM system is a government created monopoly that is supposed to be operated and maintained in the best interest of the public; but this rarely or never occurs. In reality, the SM system is operated in the best interest of the select few (ie. 0.01% of Ontario's population), and against the greater good of the public (ie. the 99.99% of Ontario).
The current Supply Management ("SM") system is operated with mis-management, lack of due diligence, secrecy, cronyism, and so as to exceed the legislated and delegated authority of the various agencies. The SM legislation is beyond the powers of the Federal and/or Provincial governments, and contrary to international treaties.
- Everyone is allowed to raise up to 2,000 meat
chickens per year.
Chicken Farmers of Ontario ("CFO") has stated that the 300 bird limit was chosen arbitrarily, they planned on it being highly restrictive, and agree that this limit is insufficient for producing chicken at affordable, competitive prices. However, CFO feels no need to allow alternative, competitive systems to exist which might be in competition with their chicken monopoly. This 300 limit takes away the farmer's right to feed their family, supply food to their local community, and earn a reasonable living.
- Everyone is allowed to self-inspect and farm-slaughter up to 300 poultry birds per year, then sell them
at their farm gate, provided they supply full disclosure to the prospective
customers. OMAF can issue a special license that exceeds
these limits under special circumstances; or in remote,
There are numerous under-serviced areas in Ontario today, with no hope of getting a commercially viable, local, provincially licensed slaughter plant. We believe that a properly trained farmer can produce eviscerated poultry carcasses that are equal or better than the high speed, automated processing factories. With full disclosure, there is no fraud, nor an imbalance of power between the buyer and seller. Private individuals should not be stripped of their right to choose their own foods.
By limiting the farm slaughter to just 300 birds, the magnitude of the total risk of farm slaughter is contained.
If a farmer feels a need for marketing more than 300 birds per year, Small Flock Poultry Farmers of Canada believe that it becomes viable above that 300 limit for the farmer to transport their flock to a Provincially-licensed abattoir, and therefore should do so. If it still isn't viable above the 300 bird slaughter limit, the burden of proof is on the farmer, and if their case has merit, OMAF can issue a special license to the farmer with the necessary conditions.
In remote areas (ie. James Bay coast, remote mine sites and work camps, etc.), we suggest that the government can issue special permits to extends these limits (2,000 and 300) further.
If this proposal is still seen as too risky for some unknown reason, the local Health Unit can inspect the farm slaughter process on an as-needed basis, for local Health Inspectors exist in all jurisdictions.