CFO says they are concerned about delivering a quality product.
As we all know, saying this pious statement is far easier than
achieving excellent quality on a consistent basis.
T.P. Wright is famous for proving the power of continuous
improvement through discovering the learning curve. In 1936,
while he was building the first airplanes for the US Air Force, he
showed that the more you repeat something, the faster, better, and
cheaper it can become. For most things, the cost for the current batch
drops to 80% of the previous batch every time the production
doubles in total units produced.
CFO has been helping chicken producers slowly improve.
For example, Canadian Chicken Farmers got a government grant to help create/improve a poultry bio-security system called Safe, Safer, Safest which defined the
risks in raising chickens, who was responsible for each risk, and
best practices to avoid or minimize those risks
In 1999,
CFO launched Safe, Safer, Safest. CFO started
with a 7 year cycle to fully implement their quality and risk
management system.
As of Jan. 2013, they have moved to a three
year implementation cycle. Since there are about 7 batches of
birds going through their raising process every year, that's 21
batches of chicken (aggregate total of 0.6 Billion birds) before the full system is implemented.
We get to eat their "practice" birds while they are putting the finishing touches on how to produce safe, bio-hazard free birds.
Compare
CFO's quality management program implementation speed to that of HAACP or ISO 9001
international quality management systems that are typically fully
implemented in just 1 year.
Anybody in the automotive parts system knows of what I speak. You had it done in time and working well or you weren't getting any more orders from your customers. That tends to put a fine focus on your priorities.
CFO seems to feel that glacially slow improvement is better than
no improvement whatsoever. I somewhat agree, but I think they can
do better.
Perhaps the consumers should wait until more of the
quality system has been implemented and proven effective before
they buy any more chicken.
For Ontario`s chicken producers to
have produced billions of chickens over decades of experience,
you'd think chicken producers would have it pretty well perfected
by now. I believe there is lots of room for even more improvement
by them. When will we see action in the best interest of the
public?
The world's best rate of continuous improvement for an industry
sector of which I am aware was better than 10% per year, every
year, for more than 20 years and counting. Perhaps CFO can use
this as a benchmark against which to measure their rate of
improvement. Unfortunately, CFO's data shows nothing, or shows
the opposite, except for their sales & marketing miracle.
Perhaps a good dose of competition could help those chickens see a
way to improve even faster. Their jobs might depend upon it.
A blog to communicate, discuss, and advocate for the civil rights and important role Small Flock Poultry Farmers can play (and should play) in Canadian Society. Small Flockers are on the side of justice & truth, and against privilege & power. Unfortunately, the more we compromise with privilege and power, the more we reduce the capacity for truth and justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Off-topic commercial spam that's posted so as to help sell your wares will be deleted.
On-topic comments, where you behave yourself and play nicely, will remain posted; whether they are pro or con. Everybody needs to fully understand all points of view so that we can find a solution that encompasses everybody's concerns. Give it your best shot.
If you decide to post, your posting becomes part of the public record, and SFPFC has full rights to use it (or not) in any reasonable manner or medium that suits our purposes.
Before posting, please proofread, and correct as necessary. If you subsequently discover a need to fix your previous posting, make an additional posting that refers to the original posting, then set the record straight.